|
BioEngine®
Semen Detection Kit
BIOENGINE®精斑鉴定试纸
Abstract
This paper describes the development of the BioEngine®
Test Kit. This kit is comprised of two main
components: acid phosphatase (AP) test strips and
prostate specific antigen (P30) test strips, which work
together to provide evidence of semen on garments and other
items.
The included AP strips were
found to detect semen down to a 1/2000 dilution, whereas
comparative testing with two other acid phosphatase (AP)
tests and a zinc test showed that their limit of detection
was 1/150-1/300.
The
P30 strips detected semen to a
1/500,000 dilution,
which was approximately the same as semenogelin test strips
used in comparative testing. Semen which was
discharged onto undergarments was detectable by the AP tests
up to 17 h, by the zinc test up to 17 h, and by the P30 and
semenogelin tests up to 36 h after intercourse.
The AP test gave a more dramatic color change than the zinc
test with small amounts of semen and therefore was chosen
for inclusion in the kit. The zinc test, on the other
hand, was more specific and would be superior when testing
directly with a vaginal swab. In contrast with
spermatozoa, which can be found in the vagina more than
seven days after intercourse, the marker proteins P30
and semenogelin became undetectable after 36 hours. We
attribute this difference to the acidic pH of the vagina,
among other factors.
Introduction
Conservative statistics indicate that
about 14% of women and 22% of men have had affairs sometime
in their marriage
[Ref. 1].
According to a recent study by the Centers for Disease
Control, about 4% of both married men and women had more
than one sexual partner in the previous twelve months.
This figure rises to 15% in the case of unmarried couples
cohabiting. These data indicate that infidelity is a
significant problem in the United States, and there exists a
need to objectively test spouses for sexual activity.
For women, one such test is for the presence of semen.
When a man
has sexual intercourse with a
woman, semen is deposited into
the woman's vagina.
Immediately after intercourse,
most of the semen flows back
out, but a some is retained in
the vagina and slowly is
discharged over a period of
several days
[Ref. 3].
Semen has over 900 identified
proteins
[Ref. 4]
among which are semenogelin I
and II (gel-forming proteins
produced by the seminal
vesicles), prostate-specific
antigen (a protease which breaks
down semenogelin), and acid
phosphatase (which breaks down
spermatozoa cell membranes)
[Ref. 5].
These proteins can be identified
by immunochromatographic assay,
which forms the principle of the
P30 test in the BioEngine kit.
Acid phosphatase can be detected
by the classic test first
described by Babson
[Ref. 6],
which forms the principle of the
AP test in the BioEngine kit.
This test relies on the
catalytic hydrolysis of
1-naphthyl phosphate to form
1-naphthol, which in turn reacts
with an aryl diazonium salt,
forming an intensely colored azo
dyestuff. In addition to
proteins, semen also has
unusually high concentrations of
zinc (100-200 mg/L v. 1
mg/L in plasma)
[Ref. 7].
Zinc acts to stabilize DNA
inside spermatozoa and also may
catalyze the gel-forming
reaction between semenogelin I
and II. Semen may be
detected by the modified zinc
test of Hooft and van de Voorde
[Ref. 8],
which forms the principle of the
zinc test developed during this
research.
The semen flowing back out of a
woman's vagina ("backflow") is
deposited on her underwear or
absorbent pad. These items
conveniently can be tested with
the BioEngine kit. The kit
also can be used to test stains
on other fabrics and surfaces.
There was some question as to
how long after intercourse
marker proteins like P30 and
semenogelin could be detected,
because of the acidic pH in the
vagina, among other factors.
The predominant microorganism in
the vagina is
lactobacillus acidophilus,
which produces lactic acid and
hydrogen peroxide, creating a
toxic environment for other
bacteria and denaturing the
three-dimensional structure of
proteins, which structure is
critical for their
immunochromatographic detection.
The detection limits for these
proteins were measured
experimentally as described
below.
Results and Discussion
Acid phosphatase test strips were
prepared according to a modification of the procedure of
Babson
[Ref. 6].
Zinc test strips were prepared according to the method of
Hooft and van de Voorde, using various filter papers as
substrate. P30, semenogelin and two other AP tests
were obtained commercially as described below. In
order to measure the relative sensitivity of these different
tests, and their ability to detect semen on undergarments,
comparative studies were performed with semen dilutions and
with analysis of garments after intercourse.
Semen dilutions
The
sensitivity of the zinc strips was tested by analyzing a
series of dilute semen samples, and acid phosphatase tests
were carried out simultaneously for comparison.
Semen was diluted with deionized water to levels of 1/10,
1/50, 1/100, 1/150, 1/200, 1/300, 1/500, 1/1,000 and 1/2,000
and tested with zinc strips and three acid phosphatase tests
(prototype BioEngine®,
CheckMate®
and Phosphatesmo KM brands). The zinc strips proved to
be sensitive to a 1/150 dilution, the prototype BioEngine
test had a detection limit of 1/100, the CheckMate®
AP test was judged to have a detection limit of 1/150 and
the Phosphatesmo KM test a detection limit of 1/300.
The AP tests were read after 15 seconds, but at high
dilutions continued to slowly turn purple. The results
are shown in Fig. 1. The zinc and BioEngine AP
test strips in this experiment were prepared using Whatman
Grade 1 filter paper. The prototype BioEngine AP test
(D) in this experiment turned out to be too weak, and
the concentration of reagents in this strip later was
increased.
The limit
of detection of semen at a 1/150 dilution by the zinc spot
test is generally consistent with the report of Hooft and
van de Voorde, who reported a detection limit of 1/128
[Ref. 8].
The Phosphatesmo
KM strips were clearly superior as a spot test for detecting
semen in this experiment because of the dramatic color
change, the small amount of enzyme needed for a reaction and
the strip's overall design. It was initially thought
that, because of acidic conditions in the vagina, it might
turn out that zinc would be the best test beyond a certain
time frame, e.g. 12 hours. This turned out not to be
true, as shown below. The Phosphatesmo KM strips were
also somewhat expensive, at $5 each.

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Control |
Control |
Control |
Control |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/10 |
1/10 |
1/10 |
1/10 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/100 |
1/100 |
1/100 |
1/100 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
 |
|
1/500 |
|
A |
|
 |
|
1/1,000 |
|
A |
|
 |
 |
|
1/2,000 |
1/2,000 |
|
A |
B |
|
 |
|
0-1/2,000 Series |
|
B |
Figure 1. Serial Dilutions of Semen and Analysis with
Zinc Strips and ACP Tests
A=Phosphatesmo KM; B=Zinc strips; C=CheckMate®
acid phosphatase test; D=Early prototype BioEngine AP
Test

Another series
of zinc strips and BioEngine acid phosphatase strips were
prepared. The zinc strips were prepared according to
the procedure of Hooft and van de Voorde using Whatman Grade
1, Whatman Grade 3 and VWR Grade 417 filter paper. The
AP strips were prepared according to a modification of
Babson and contained approximately 5 mg citrate buffer, 1 mg
1-naphthyl phosphate and 1.6 mg Dye Fast Blue B salt per
strip, using Whatman Grade 1 and Whatman Grade 3 filter
paper. A semen dilution series with these strips in
shown in Fig 2. The zinc strips proved to have
a detection limit of 1/250, while the AP strips had a
detection limit of 1/2000. The BioEngine AP strips
proved to be somewhat more sensitive then the Phosphatesmo
strips used for comparison in this experiment, although they
had a slight tan color. (Perhaps this increased
sensitivity can be attributed to a greater amount of
reagent.) Because of the dramatic purple color change
upon exposure to acid phosphatase, however, this tan color
(most likely due to degradation of the diazonium salt
component) was judged not to be important. Whatman
Grade 3 paper seemed to give the best contrast with the zinc
strips, whereas Whatman Grade 1 paper gave the best results
among the AP strips.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/50, 1/10 (Zn)
Whatman Grade 1
|
1/50,
1/10 (Zn)
Whatman Grade 3 |
1/50,
1/10 (Zn)
VWR 417 |
1/50,
1/10 (AP)
Whatman Grade 1 |
1/50,
1/10 (AP)
Whatman Grade 3 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/150, 1/100 (Zn)
Whatman Grade 1
|
1/150,
1/100 (Zn)
Whatman Grade 3 |
1/150,
1/100 (Zn)
VWR 417 |
1/150,
1/100 (AP)
Whatman Grade 1 |
1/150,
1/100 (AP)
Whatman Grade 3 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/500, 1/250 (Zn)
Whatman Grade 1
|
1/500,
1/250 (Zn)
Whatman Grade 3 |
1/500,
1/250 (Zn)
VWR 417 |
1/500,
1/250 (AP)
Whatman Grade 1 |
1/500,
1/250 (AP)
Whatman Grade 3 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
1/2000, 1/1000 (AP)
overloaded
Whatman Grade 1
|
1/2000,
1/1000 (AP)
Whatman Grade 1 |
1/2000,
1/500 (AP)
Phosphatesmo KM |
Figure 2.
Serial Dilutions of Semen and Analysis with Zinc Strips and
Acid Phosphatase Tests Using different grades of filter
paper (dilutions are listed by top, bottom)

The sensitivity of P30 strips from various manufacturers was
measured using a similar dilution series, and a semenogelin
immunochromatographic
test was used simultaneously for comparison. The
results are shown in
Fig 3. Strips A, B and D
are P30, while strip B is semenogelin. Both
tests proved to be sensitive down to a dilution of 1/500,000
which is generally consistent with that previously reported
[Ref.
9].
Since semenogelin strips were ten times more expensive than
P30 strips, the latter were chosen for inclusion in the
BioEngine kit. The P30 strips were also judged to have
better visibility than the semenogelin strips.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/500,000 |
1/500,000 |
1/500,000 |
1/500,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/1,000,000 |
1/1,000,000 |
1/1,000,000 |
1/1,000,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/2,000,000 |
1/2,000,000 |
1/2,000,000 |
1/2,000,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
Figure 3.
Serial Dilutions of Semen and Analysis with P30 Strips and
Semenogelin Strips from various Manufacturers A= P30;
B= Semenogelin; C= P30; D= P30. Note:
P30 strips from Company "A" and Company "C" look identical
and raw materials probably come from the same distributor.

Finally, a comparative study was conducted between seven
different brands of P30 strips, as well as an RSIDTM
semenogelin test, using the same semen dilution series as
before. The results are shown in Fig 4. Strips
A-E,
G and H are P30, while F and I
are semenogelin. There were notable differences
between brands. The "E" brand was chosen for
inclusion in the BioEngine kit because it seemed to have the
best sensitivity and readability. A few QC problems
were noted with the "B" strips, which otherwise were
identical with "E". The RSID test ("I")
did not work well under these conditions, probably because
the required buffer solutions were not used to run the test,
but plain water was used instead. In contrast, the
semenogelin strips from company "F" worked just fine.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
1/1,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
G |
I |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
1/10,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
I |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/50,000 |
1/50,000 |
1/50,000 |
1/50,000 |
1/50,000 |
1/50,000 |
1/50,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
G |
I |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
1/100,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
I |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/250,000 |
1/250,000 |
1/250,000 |
1/250,000 |
1/250,000 |
|
A |
B |
D |
E |
G |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/500,000 |
1/500,000 |
1/500,000 |
1/500,000 |
1/500,000 |
|
A |
B |
D |
E |
G |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/1,000,000 |
1/1,000,000 |
1/1,000,000 |
1/1,000,000 |
1/1,000,000 |
1/1,000,000 |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
G |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/2,000,000 |
1/2,000,000 |
1/2,000,000 |
1/2,000,000 |
|
B |
D |
E |
G |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
1/4,000,000 |
1/4,000,000 |
1/4,000,000 |
1/4,000,000 |
|
B |
D |
E |
G |
Figure 4. Serial dilutions of semen and comparative
testing between brands of P30 and semenogelin strips.
A = P30; B = P30; C = P30; D = P30;
E = P30; F = Semenogelin; G = P30; H =
P30; I = Independent Forensics RSIDTM
(semenogelin). Note: P30 strips from Company
"B" and Company "E" look identical.

Extraction of
Garments
Control experiments were carried to demonstrate negative
reactions.
Fig. 5 shows women's underwear with typical vaginal
discharge, which was known to be negative for semen.
The zinc strip showed no color change when used to analyze
these garments, nor did it show any time dependency.
The Phosphatesmo test, on the other hand, started to turn
purple after 15 s, while the CheckMate®
test started to change after 10 minutes. The BioEngine
AP strips did not react at all (not pictured). This
demonstrates that vaginal acid phosphatase interferes with
the detection of seminal AP and will give a false positive
test in as little as 60 s. The garments were analyzed
by wetting the area of interest with 1-2 drops of water, and
then pressing test strips against the areas (zinc and
Phosphatesmo) or by pressing a filter paper circle against
the area (followed by a CheckMate®
AP test).
In order to determine how long semen can be detected on
underwear, the undergarments of a volunteer were analyzed at
periods of 0-10, 10-17 and 17-34 hours after intercourse.
Fresh cotton underwear was worn during each time period.
The garments were analyzed using zinc strips, three acid
phosphatase tests (BioEngine®
strips, CheckMate®
and Phosphatesmo KM brands), P30 strips and semenogelin
strips. The results from the zinc and AP tests are
shown in Fig. 6-7. The two acid phosphatase
strips again proved to be sensitive and convenient, yielding
a dramatic purple reaction after a few seconds. The
CheckMate®
test took somewhat longer to turn blue, the reaction rate
being dependent on the freshness of reagents. The zinc
test turned red when pressed against the suspect area, but
the result was not as dramatic as the acid phosphatase
tests. A P30 test was performed for confirmation,
showing a strongly positive P30 test after 10 h (after 17 h
the AP tests were done first and soaked up inordinate
amounts of material, which explains the weak P30). The
zinc test was very slightly positive after 34 h, while
Phosphatesmo and CheckMate®
were judged to be negative. The P30 test was also very
slightly positive. (UV light was found not to be
useful in visualizing semen stains. These stains
appeared not to be fluorescent.)
The results from
the P30 and semenogelin tests are shown in Fig. 8.
P30 was detectable up to 32 h after intercourse, whereas
semenogelin was detectable only up to 20 h. In
addition, the P30 strip had slightly better visibility.
Since P30 strips are 1/10th the price of semenogelin strips,
the former were chosen for inclusion in the BioEngine kit.
The original paper by Hooft et al
[Ref. 3]
stated that the zinc test was more sensitive and specific
than the classical AP test. This test was based on
analyzing vaginal swabs from a gynecologist's office, and
also evidentiary material from alleged sexual assaults
(probably also vaginal swabs). This method is much
different from analyzing women's underwear. Vaginal
swabs analyze source material deep in the vagina, whereas
underwear has absorbed whatever leaks out. Zinc is
probably much more concentrated in the vagina. In
addition, there was an unknown time period between sample
collection and laboratory analysis of the swabs, during
which time seminal proteins could have become denatured or
cleaved, releasing the zinc bound to them. Thus, these two
methods really aren't comparable.
Although laboratory testing with zinc
chloride has shown that the limit of detection of the strips
is approximately 0.01 mg/mL of zinc, the limit of detection
of semen is 1/200, corresponding to a free zinc
concentration of about 1 mg/mL (assuming 200mg/mL in semen).
This means that zinc is probably 99% bound to proteins and
other compounds in semen. This is consistent with literature
reports that zinc tends to form complexes with other
components of semen and that after ejaculation, 50% is bound
to seminal vesicle proteins
[Ref. 7].
These results indicate that semen
could be detected by the AP and zinc tests up to 17 h, and
by the P30 and semenogelin tests up to 36 h after
intercourse. These data are consistent with those
reported in the literature, where it is reported that AP is
generally not detectable beyond 12-18 h after intercourse
[Ref. 11],
that P30 levels return to baseline by 48 h, and that
semenogelin has been detected up to 47 h
[Ref. 13]. This
experiment was repeated twice with identical results.
The volunteer
still had semen visible in her vagina after 36 h as a
stringy white substance; however, no marker proteins could
be detected. We attribute this observation to the
denaturization of seminal proteins by the acidic pH of the
vagina (in a fashion similar to egg whites when they are
cooked), among other factors.
|
 |
 |
|
Control |
Control |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Control zinc |
Control
Phosphatesmo
15 s |
Control
Phosphatesmo
60 s |
Control
CheckMate®
15 s |
Control
CheckMate®
20 m |
Fig. 5.
Control specimens of women's underwear showing typical
vaginal discharge with negative test results.

|
 |
|
0-10 h |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
zinc
pressed
0-10 h |
Phosphatesmo
0-10 h |
CheckMate®
0-10 h |
P30
0-10 h |
zinc test
of extract
0-10 h |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
zinc
pressed
10-17 h |
Phosphatesmo
10-17 h |
CheckMate®
10-17 h |
P30
10-17 h |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
zinc
pressed
17-34 h |
Phosphatesmo
17-34 h |
CheckMate®
17-34 h |
P30
17-34 h |
Fig. 6.
Tests of women's underwear with zinc and AP tests, plus P30
for confirmation (note: there is no visual difference
between control and test undergarments).

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Zn 0-12 h
Whatman Grade 3
|
Zn 12-36
h
Whatman Grade 3 |
AP 0-12
h
Whatman Grade 1 |
AP 0-12
h
Whatman Grade 3 |
AP 0-12
h
VWR
Grade 417 |
Fig. 7.
Additional tests of women's underwear (5 separate pairs) at
intervals after intercourse with zinc and AP tests

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
0-12 h
P30 |
12-24 h
P30 |
24-36
h
P30 |
36-60
h
P30 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
0-12 h
P30 |
0-12 h
Semenogelin |
12-36
h
P30 |
12-36
h
Semenogelin |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
0-8 h
P30 |
0-8 h
Semenogelin |
8-20 h
P30 |
8-20 h
Semenogelin |
20-32 h
P30 |
20-32 h
Semenogelin |
32-47 h
P30 |
32-47 h
Semenogelin |
Figure 8.
Extraction of cotton underwear at intervals after sexual
intercourse and testing for P30 and semenogelin. Three
separate trials are shown.

Extraction of
Absorptive Pads
In order to
determine whether a woman's menstrual period affects the
ability to detect P30, the absorptive pads of a volunteer on
her menstrual period were analyzed at various intervals
after intercourse. The pads were analyzed using P30
strips. The results are shown in Fig. 9-10.
P30 was detectable up to 36 h after intercourse, which was
approximately the same result obtained by analyzing
undergarments while not on a menstrual period. These
results indicate that a woman's menstrual period does not
interfere with the immunochromatographic detection of P30.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
0-12 h |
12-24 h |
24-36
h |
36-48
h |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
0-8 h |
8-19 h |
19-24 h |
24-32 h
|
32-43 h
|
43-56 h |
Figure 9.
Extraction of menstrual absorptive pads at intervals after
sexual intercourse. Two separate trials are shown.

Conclusion
AP test strips
have been prepared based on the classic reaction first
reported by Babson. These strips proved to be
sensitive and convenient to use, and were able to detect
semen which was discharged onto a woman's undergarment up to
17 h after intercourse. The AP strips gave a more
dramatic color change than zinc strips with actual specimens
of used underwear, and therefore were chosen for inclusion
in the BioEngine kit. P30 was found to be the best
marker protein for immunochromatographic detection of semen,
based mainly on cost. Product evaluation of P30 strips
from several manufacturers allowed identification of the
best brand of strip. These strips can detect semen
which has been discharged up to 36 h after intercourse.
It is recommended that the AP strips be used first to test
an item, providing presumptive evidence of semen, followed
by the more sensitive and specific P30 test for confirmatory
evidence.
Summary
Zinc test strips have been prepared according to the method
of Hooft and van de Voorde. These strips were found to
detect semen to a dilution of 1/250. Acid phosphatase
strips were prepared according to a modification of the
procedure of Babson, and had a detection limit of 1/2000.
The CheckMate®
and Phosphatesmo AP tests had detection limits of 1/150 and
1/300, respectively. There was no difference in
sensitivity between the P30 and semenogelin strips, which
both detected semen to a dilution of 1/500,000.
Testing of cotton undergarments showed that semen discharged
onto them could be detected by the AP and zinc tests up to
17 h, and by the P30 and semenogelin tests up to 36 h after
intercourse. Semen was still visible in the
volunteer's vagina after this time. These results
suggest that marker proteins such as P30 and semenogelin are
denatured to undetectable levels by 48 h after intercourse,
possibly due to the acidic pH of the vagina, and other
factors such as oxidation by hydrogen peroxide and enzymatic
cleavage by other seminal proteases.
Experimental
Materials.
Zinc test strips were prepared
according to the procedure of Hooft and van de Voorde, using
Whatman No.1, No. 3 and VWR No. 417 filter papers as
substrates. Acid phosphatase test strips were prepared
according to a modification of the method of Babson
[Ref. 6] using the same
filter papers as above and mounted to a plastic backing as
an assembly. P30 test strips were obtained from
several proprietary suppliers. AP test kits were
obtained from Evergreen Industries (CheckMate®
brand) or CTL Scientific Supply (Phosphatesmo KM),
respectively. Semenogelin strips were obtained from
Independent Forensics of Illinois (RSIDTM
cassettes) or a proprietary supplier (strips), respectively.
Zinc test:
A 2-5 drop aliquot of deionized water was placed on a
suspect area of a garment, and a zinc strip was pressed
against it. A color change from yellow to pink was a
POSITIVE test. Alternatively, a cotton-tipped swab was
placed against the wetted area of the garment, and then the
garment was pressed gently around the swab in order to
saturate the swab with solution. This was done in
several places on the garment. Then, the swab was
pressed against a zinc test strip. This procedure
yielded a more easily visualized, higher-contrast spot.
It also avoided leaving any stain on the garment.
AP test:
A 2-5 drop aliquot of deionized water was placed on a
suspect area of a garment, and an AP test strip was pressed
against it. A color change to bright purple within 15
s was a POSITIVE test. Alternatively, a cotton-tipped
swab was placed against the wetted area of the garment, and
then the garment was pressed gently around the swab in order
to saturate the swab with solution. This was done in
several places on the garment. Then, the swab was
pressed against an AP test strip. This procedure
yielded an easily visualized, high-contrast spot. It
also avoided leaving any stain on the garment.
P30 test.
A 15-mL aliquot of water was placed in a coffee cup.
The suspect area (i.e. crotch) of a pair of cotton underwear
was extracted in the cup by repeatedly allowing water to
soak in, then pressing it out. Finally, the garment
was wrung out into the cup. A P30 test strip then was
placed into the cup. It was necessary to tilt the cup
on edge to immerse the strip. Care was taken not to
immerse the strip above the marker line. After 10
minutes, the strip was removed and laid on a clean, dry
surface. The strip was read after an additional 10
minutes. Resolution continued to improve for 30
minutes after the strip was removed from the coffee cup, but
tended to decrease after that. A POSITIVE test was
indicated by two lines as shown in
Fig. 10.
A strongly positive test was clearly visible within two
minutes, while a weakly positive test took 20 minutes (after
immersion) to become evident.
Absorptive pads were tested by placing 25 mL of water into
the coffee cup (for a full pad) or 10 mL for a mini-pad, and
repeatedly extracting the pad manually. Then, the pad
was wrung out into the cup and discarded. The P30 test
was carried out as usual.
NOTE:
latex gloves were used for these procedures.
Figure 10. Simplified diagram for performing a P30
test.
References
1、Laumann, E. O.
et al. "The Social Organization of Sexuality:
Sexual Practices in the United States"; University of
Chicago Press: Chicago, 1994, p. 216.
2、Mosher, W. D.
et al. "Sexual
Behavior and Selected Health Measures: Men and Women 15-44
Years of Age, United States, 2002," Advance Data
2005, 362, p. 10.
3、Hooft, P. J. and van de Voorde,
H. P. "Bayesian
Evaluation of the Modified Zinc Test and the Acid
Phosphatase Spot Test for Forensic Semen Investigation,"
American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology
1997, 18, 45-49.
4、Pilch, B. and
Mann, M. Genome Biology 2006, 7:R40.
5、Tanaka, M.
et al FEBS Letters 2004, 571,
197-204.
6、Babson, A. L.
et al, Am. J. Clin. Path. 1959, 32, pp.
88-91.
7、Owen, D. H.
and Katz, D. F. Journal of Andrology 2005,
26, 459-469.
8、Hooft, P.; van
de Voorde, H. and van Dijck, P. Forensic Science
International 1992, 53, 131-133.
9、Pang, B. C. M.
and Cheung, B. K. K. Forensic Science International
2007, 169, 27-31.
10、Gartside, B.
O.; Brewer, K. J. and Strong, C. L. Forensic
Science Communications 2003, 5 (2).
11、Khaldi, N.
et al. J. Forensic Sci. 2004, 49
(4), p. 1-5.
12、SERATEC GmbH.
"P30 in Body Fluids--an overview for users of the SERATEC
P30 SEMIQUANT Tests."
13、Keil, W.;
Bachus, J. and Tröger, H. D. Int. J. Legal Medicine
1996, 108 (4), p. 186-190.
This paper
was published on March 19, 2008. The BioEngine®
Semen Detection Kit and certain technology described
in this paper is covered under a pending U.S. patent.


搜索关键词:立可读
本产品诚招各地经销商和地区代理人.
|